See every claim, flag and experiment that is actually live in your product. Then turn a plain-English request into a pull request your engineers review.
See it. Change it. Ship it.
Free to start. Connected in an afternoon.
charge.ts:88Assertedcharge.ts:95fix/retry-limit6 files · awaiting your reviewEngineering is the only part of the company that can answer for the product. So everything queues behind it.
A founder asking what the refund policy actually is. A PM changing a limit. A support lead checking whether a flag is on. Every one of those is a ticket, a thread, and a wait.
One day of work, six days of everything else. The queue and the archaeology are the whole problem, and they are the two parts a system can absorb.
The request used to cost a ticket and a sprint. Now it costs a sentence, and it comes back as a pull request.
No translation step. No grooming session. An engineer gets a reviewable pull request instead of an interrupt.
A failed charge is retried up to 3 times before past_due.
Retry up to 5 times, not 3.
After the merge the guide re-reads itself. The claim comes back proven, not stale.
Every flag and what it gates. Every event and whether it still fires. Every experiment nobody cleaned up, each carrying the line that declares it.
Read straight out of the code. Ten seconds to answer “wait, are we even tracking that?”
Every tool that lets non-engineers ship code fails the same way: engineering cleans up after it. So the work arrives as a branch and a draft pull request. They review. You watch it move.
A real branch and a draft PR on your own remote, with the request in the description. No new tool for them to adopt.
Every change opens as a draft until a human approves it. There is no setting that turns this off.
The board above is the answer to “where is that at?”, without a standup or a nudge in anyone’s DMs.
You are about to change things based on what this system says is true. So nothing it says arrives as an opinion.
A refund can never exceed the amount originally captured.
Payments · Refunds · one of 38 claims in this feature
refund.ts:42refund.spec.ts:118passing 6 hrs agoRaises the retry limit herself. It comes back as a draft pull request, not a ticket in someone’s queue.
Answers why a charge failed from the cited behaviour, at the moment the customer asks.
Exports the claim, the line, and the date a test last proved it. No screenshots, no interviews.
Stops being the lookup service. Reviews a diff instead of answering the same question again.
An engineer sets it up once. After that it is a button anyone on the team can press, and the reading still happens on your own hardware.
heartbeatevery 5 seconds
Two installs, one sign-in, one worker. After that, nobody on the team opens a terminal for Kanon again.
runs as: youA worker daemon on an engineer’s machine or your own CI box. It claims one task at a time and works in an isolated checkout. We run nothing.
Your Claude Code plan does the reading. No third-party inference vendor sits between us and your source, because there is no path from us to your source.
Out: {type, payload}. A task type and validated ids, never a free-text prompt. Back: claims, one-line activity labels, and file paths. No file contents, ever.
The product side of engineering, finally operable.
See it. Change it. Ship it.
Requested in plain English. Reviewed by your engineers. Shipped as pull requests.